Health Law

Published on: September 4, 2013

Michigan Medicaid Expansion Approved by House

On Tuesday, September 3, 2013, the Michigan House gave final legislative approval to Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This legislation, House Bill 4714, is expected to be signed by Governor Rick Snyder in the coming weeks.

The Affordable Care Act increases federal funding for states that increase eligibility standards for Medicaid enrollment. As passed in 2010, Medicaid expansion was mandatory under the Act, but was subsequently made option by a 2012 Supreme Court decision. CMS administration has announced that states do not have a deadline for deciding whether or not to expand, and in addition, states are free to terminate expansion with financial penalty from the federal government.

Federal funds are available as early as January 1, 2014, but Michigan will likely delay implementation until the spring. According to a Michigan Senate Fiscal Agency analysis published in March that examines the Snyder Administration’s proposed expansion of Michigan’s Medicaid program, the state’s decision to expand could cover an additional 400,000 Michigan residents by means of $1.7 billion in federal funding. Wachler & Associates will continue to keep you updated on Michigan’s decision to expand Medicaid enrollment and other significant healthcare law news. Please subscribe to the Wachler & Associates health law blog by adding your email address and clicking “Subscribe” in the window on the top right of this page.

Published on: August 12, 2013

Health Care for Detroit Employees and Retirees at Risk under Detroit Bankruptcy

by Wachler & Associates, P.C.

On July 18, 2013, Detroit’s emergency manager Kevin Orr filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection in the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Emergency manager Kevin Orr, appointed by Governor Rick Snyder, is tasked with financial control of the city and the power to liquidate city assets. Orr is focused on restructuring Detroit’s debt. Detroit is the largest municipality in United States history to file for bankruptcy.

Retiree health care program costs are a named source of Detroit’s bankruptcy filing. Kevin Orr’s bankruptcy filing, a decision authorized by Governor Snyder, occurred one day after Detroit’s two largest municipal pension funds filed suit in state court to stop Orr from cutting retiree health care benefits for Detroit residents. Detroit’s retirees are now worried about possible cuts to their promised healthcare benefits. In a press conference after the filing, Kevin Orr assured Detroit residents that for the next six months there would be no cuts to health care benefits for Detroit’s active workers and retirees.

On August 2, 2013, Kevin Orr announced a new health care plan for city workers that he believes will save the city almost $12 million per year. Orr’s proposal increases workers’ annual deductibles and caps on out-of-pocket costs. If the unions reject Orr’s proposal, then Orr still has the power to change employees’ health care plans under Michigan’s emergency manager law. According to the Detroit Free Press, union leaders are not convinced that Orr’s plan is the best alternative to the current situation.

Published on: August 7, 2013

CMS Issues Much Anticipated Final Rules on Payment of Medicare Part B Inpatient Services and Payment of Hospital Inpatient Services under Medicare Part A

by Wachler & Associates, P.C.

On August 2, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) released its much-anticipated final rules, CMS-1455-F and CMS-1599-F, finalizing two previously issued proposals that addressed payment policies related to patient status in short-stay hospital cases: (1) payment of Medicare Part B inpatient services; and (2) admission and medical review criteria for payment of hospital inpatient services under Medicare Part A. The effective date of the final rule is October 1, 2013.

Notwithstanding these final rules, CMS stated that hospitals will be permitted to follow the Part B billing timeframes established in CMS-1455R Ruling regarding appeals and the submission of Part B claims after the effective date of the final rule, provided (1) the Part A inpatient claim denial was one to which the Ruling originally applied; or (2) the Part A inpatient claim has a date of admission before October 1, 2013, and is denied after September 30, 2013, on the grounds that the medical care was reasonable and necessary, but the inpatient admission was not.

Payment of Medicare Part B Inpatient Services

Published on: July 31, 2013

The Medicare Appeals Process Is Overburdened

by Wachler & Associates, P.C.

Healthcare and healthcare law professionals across the country are noticing that as Medicare audit numbers are climbing, so too is the length of the Medicare appeals process. Once a provider or healthcare entity receives a denial from a Medicare contractor, the Medicare appeals process consists of five stages:

• Redetermination, which is filed with a Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC)

• Reconsideration, which is filed with a Qualified Independent Contractor (QIC)

Published on: July 30, 2013

Medicare and Medicaid Program Integrity: MACs and ZPICs out, UPICs in

by Wachler & Associates, P.C.

Last Friday, the vice president of legal affairs for the American Health Care Association (AHCA), Dianna De La Mare, reported that CMS will be combining the integrity responsibilities of the Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPICs) and the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) into one integrity contractor. These newly designated integrity contractors, the Unified Program Integrity Contractors (UPIC), will focus on both Medicare and Medicaid integrity issues. Dianna De La Mar also reported that the new UPICs will encompass the MAC integrity responsibilities and will retire the Medicaid Integrity Contractors (MICs).

Follow the Wachler & Associates Health Law Blog for updates on UPICs and other important health law issues. If you have any questions regarding how UPICs may affect your practice, please contact an experienced health care attorney at Wachler & Associates attorney at 248-544-0888.

Published on: July 24, 2013

Update on Medicare Demand Letters Issued for Incarcerated Beneficiaries

by Wachler & Associates, P.C.

In our recent blog post, CMS Issues Demand Letters to Providers and Suppliers with Claims for Services Provided to Allegedly Incarcerated Beneficiaries, we discussed the large number of demand letters CMS released regarding Medicare overpayments for incarcerated beneficiaries. Since that blog post was written, CMS has issued an update, stating that the information connected to these incarceration periods was incomplete in some cases.

CMS is currently reviewing this information and will take action to improve the procedures used to detect incarceration periods. Furthermore, CMS is trying to identify the recent overpayment demand letters that were incomplete and make corrections to those respective demand letters. CMS announced that it will continue to inform the public about this issue and the timelines for to fix their error. Such announcements can be found on the All-Fee-For-Service-Providers page on the CMS website.

In lieu of this new information, providers should not contact their CMS Regional Offices, as CMS is currently working to resolve this issue. However, we do still encourage providers to investigate this possibility of reimbursement and to contact us if they need assistance reviewing current state laws to determine whether reimbursement may be a possibility. Wachler & Associates will continue to keep you updated on this topic and other important healthcare law issues on the Wachler & Associates Blog.

Published on: July 23, 2013

CMS Issues Demand Letters to Providers and Suppliers with Claims for Services Provided to Allegedly Incarcerated Beneficiaries

by Wachler & Associates, P.C.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is issuing demand letters seeking recoupment of reimbursement from medical providers and suppliers for Medicare beneficiaries that, according to data from the Social Security Administration (SSA), were allegedly “incarcerated” at the time services were provided. According to the Code of Federal Regulations (42 CFR 411.4) and Section 1862(a)(2) of the Social Security Act, with limited exceptions, Medicare does not make payments under Medicare Part A or Part B for incarcerated beneficiaries’ medical services. The SSA uses the Prisoner Update Processing System (PUPS) to notify CMS contractors to stop Medicare payment for patients in custody of penal authorities.

CMS considers a beneficiary “incarcerated” in circumstances that do not only involve physical confinement. Commentary on 42 CFR 411.4 explains that this definition of “custody” is consistent with the Federal courts’ definition of custody for the purpose of habeas corpus protections of the Constitution. According to commentary on 42 CFR 411.4, as well as the related CMS bulletin, individuals in “custody” include those who are:

• Under arrest

Published on: July 22, 2013

CMS Releases CY 2014 OPPS Proposed Rule to Influence Hospitals and Outpatient Providers

by Wachler & Associates, P.C.

On July 9, 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the 2014 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) proposed rule (CMS -1601-P). This 718 page document advocates for a shift in the Medicare OPPS and Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system to foster payment efficiency. In the United States, over 4,000 hospitals are paid through the OPPS and close to 5,000 Medicare-participating ASCs are paid though the ASC payment system.

According to the proposed rule, the statutorily mandated proposition (by Section 1833(t) of the Social Security Act) aims “to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from… continuing experience with these systems.” Policies, provisions, and program requirements CMS wishes to update and refine include:

• Payment weights and conversion factors for services payable under OPPS • ASC payment rates • Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program • ASC Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program • Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program • Conditions for coverage (CfCs) for organ procurement organizations (OPOs)

Published on: July 17, 2013

CMS Issues Final Rule Requiring Written Agreements Between LTC Facilities and Hospices

by Wachler & Associates, P.C.

Recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a final rule mandating that long term care (LTC) facilities and hospice providers enter into written agreements if the facility chooses to arrange hospice services through a Medicare-certified hospice provider. The rule becomes effective on August 26, 2013.

This final rule comes after the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General (OIG) raised several concerns regarding hospice care in Medicare-certified skilled nursing facilities and Medicare-certified nursing facilities. In September 2009, the OIG released a report that found nearly one-third of Medicare hospice beneficiaries lived in nursing facilities and that 82% of hospice claims for these beneficiaries did not meet the requirements for Medicare coverage. In addition, both hospices and LTC facilities are required by law to provide many similar services, which creates a greater likelihood that residents may receive duplicative or missing services.

As a result, CMS has added a new Condition of Participation (CoP) that now requires LTC facilities to have a written agreement in place to create a clear division of responsibilities between LTC facilities and contracted hospice providers. CMS believes that this new rule will improve the quality and coordination of care for LTC residents who elect to receive the hospice benefit.

Published on: July 8, 2013

Affordable Care Act Employer Mandate Penalties to be Delayed One Year

by Wachler & Associates, P.C.

On July 2, 2013, the United States Department of Treasury (DOT) announced that the enforcement of the penalty for large employers not offering health insurance to its employees under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will be delayed until January 1, 2015. This provision is known as the employer mandate.

The employer mandate is one of the key provisions of the ACA, and requires that large employers pay a penalty for every month they fail to offer full-time employees and their dependents the opportunity to enroll in an employer-sponsored health insurance plan. A full time employee is defined as an employee who works at least 30 hours per week. The penalty was originally one-twelfth of $750 per employee, but in 2010 under reconciliation legislation the penalty was raised to one-twelfth of $2000 per employee for every month the employee is not offered the opportunity to enroll in the employer-sponsored plan. A “large employer” is defined in the ACA as an employer who employs an average of at least 50 full time employees on business days during the preceding year. Included in the number of full-time employees is the number of part-time employees multiplied by the aggregate number of hours they worked for the month, divided by 120.

According to the DOT announcement, the Administration decided to delay the employer mandate as a result of concerns from the business community regarding the complexity of the employer mandate, and businesses requests for more time to implement the mandate effectively. The delay will allow the Administration to consider how to simplify the reporting requirements under the ACA, and give more time to businesses to adapt to the ACA standards. The DOT committed to publish formal guidance for this transition within the week.