Published on:

by

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) are using Comparative Billing Reports as a tool to educate providers about their individual billing practices. Comparative Billing Reports (“CBRs”) show individual providers how their billing patterns for various codes and procedures compare to the state average and the national average for providers within the same field (e.g. physical therapists and chiropractors). These comparative studies are designed to help providers review their coding and billing practices and utilization patterns, and take proactive compliance measures. CMS has stated that “the CBR is not intended to be punitive or sent as an indication of fraud. Rather it is intended to be a proactive statement that will help the provider identify potential errors in their billing practice.”

CMS awarded Safeguard Services, LLC the contract for producing the CBRs and has recommended that CBRs be sent out to certain provider types that have been identified as a vulnerability in the Medicare Program. As of now, the provider types that have been identified to receive CBRs are physical therapists, chiropractors, ambulance, hospice, podiatry, and sleep studies. A maximum of 5,000 providers will be selected to receive CBRs in each provider class.

CBR data analysis involves the same data-mining tools used by Medicare audit contractors to identify candidates for audit. If you have received a CBR or are a possible candidate to receive a CBR in the future, CMS may consider you a statistical outlier in comparison to your peers, subjecting you to an increased risk of audits. It is important to review the information provided, ensure the data reported is accurate and integrate any necessary compliance measures. CBRs are to be used as a tool for providers to look at their individual billing patterns in comparison to peers in their specialty, identify any potential errors and take proactive compliance efforts. Upon receiving a CBR, it is vital that providers evaluate the information and design a proper compliance plan to address any vulnerabilities and prepare for or defend against potential future audits. If you are a recipient of a CBR or are among the provider types that have been identified to receive CBRs (i.e. physical therapists, chiropractors, ambulance, hospice, podiatry, and sleep studies), please contact a Wachler & Associates attorney at 248-544-0888 to discuss evaluating the CBR analysis and development of an appropriate compliance plan that will reduce audit risks.

Published on:

by

On June 8, 2011, the Health Information Technology Policy Committee (“HITPC”) advised the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to push its deadline for Stage 2 meaningful use requirements to 2014. The current deadline is 2013 for providers who achieve Stage 1 meaningful use requirements in the 2011 payment year. Upon reviewing the Meaningful Use Workgroup’s recommendations, HITPC acknowledged that requiring providers who achieve Stage 1 requirements in 2011 to meet Stage 2 requirements in 2013 can be seen as penalizing early adopters. Therefore, as a way to prevent providers from delaying Stage 1 attestation, HITPC urged HHS to allow those who meet Stage 1 in 2011 an additional year to meet the requirements of Stage 2.

The American Hospital Association (“AHA”), one of the organizations that provided comments to the Meaningful Use Workgroup, proposed that Stage 2 be pushed back until three-fourths of eligible providers are compliant with Stage 1. In addition, AHA recognized that less than 2% of responding providers confirmed that they were able to meet the minimum meaningful use requirements when the initial incentive payments became available. The organization also noted that initiating Stage 2 requirements too quickly may cause providers to become overwhelmed and decreases their ability to properly comply.

If you need help understanding the meaningful use requirements or assistance with negotiating EHR contracts, please contact a Wachler and Associates attorney at 248-544-0888.

Published on:

by

Wachler & Associate’s attorney Amy Fehn, as a member of the ABA’s ACO Task Force, recently participated in the drafting of comments on CMS’ proposed regulations for ACO participation in the Medicare Shared Savings Program. The proposed regulations will govern the way in which ACOs will contract with CMS to become responsible for the delivery of care to an assigned population of Medicare fee for service beneficiaries. The ABA’s ACO Task Force prepared comments to help CMS properly develop ACOs by highlighting some of the problematic areas of the proposed regulations. Click here to view the full version ABA’s comments on the ACO proposed regulations.

For assistance with interpreting the ACO Shared Savings program regulations, or for assistance with creating an infrastructure conducive to ACO participation, please contact a Wachler & Associates attorney at 248-544-0888.

Published on:

by

DCS Healthcare added 11 new approved issues for medical necessity reviews for providers in Region A states. The recently approved new issues may be reviewed for providers in Pennsylvania, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, Delaware, New York, Connecticut, Vermont, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island, excluding Maryland. The new issues include:

• MS-DRG 885 psychoses

• MS-DRG 188 pleural effusion without CC-MCC

Continue reading
Published on:

by

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has extended the deadline for the submission of the Pioneer ACO Model program letters of intent to June 30, 2011. Additionally, the Application deadline has been extended to August 19, 2011. Applications received from organizations that have not submitted a letter of intent will not be considered.

Click the following links to complete the Pioneer ACO letter of intent and application. If you wish to participate in CMS’ Pioneer ACO Model program and need assistance in doing so, please contact a Wachler & Associates attorney at 248-544-0888.

Published on:

by

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a favorable advisory opinion for a Requestor regarding a vaccine reminder program. In February 2011, the Requestor, a manufacturer of pneumococcal bacteria vaccines for immunization of infants and toddlers, expanded a vaccine reminder program to entities that insure and treat patients covered by federal healthcare programs. Prior to February the reminder program was only to the parents or guardians of children who may have needed one or more doses of the vaccine.

Under the expansion, the Requestor offers the reminder program to entities regardless of the number of children that have been or will be vaccinated. The Requestor also pays for the reminders, either through telephone calls or postcards and there is no other charge to the entities that wish to participate. The reminder postcards or telephone calls do not refer to a specific product and do not recommend a specific avenue for vaccination. They merely suggest that the child’s parent or guardian contact a clinic to determine if a vaccine is required.

The OIG analyzed the program under the beneficiary inducement statute and the anti-kickback statute. The OIG first concluded that the reminder messages to the parents from the Requestor were not inducements since they only inform the parents about the potential need to have a vaccination. Further, the OIG determined that the relationship between the Requestor and the healthcare entities did not violate the anti-kickback statute. Although there is some independent value to the entities from the program, there is a low risk of fraud and abuse because of several factors, including: the arrangement was narrowly tailored and transparent, available to all health insurers and entities regardless of their use of the Requestor’s vaccines and the reminder messages do not recommend a specific vaccine or course of vaccination, thus they still encourage patient’s freedom of choice.

Continue reading
Published on:

by

In February, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services published its Final rule implementing changes in the provider enrollment processes. Effective March 25, 2011, providers participating in Medicare, Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program will undergo an initial screening process prior to enrollment. In addition, providers are now required to revalidate their compliance with CMS enrollment requirements every five years. Suppliers of durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies (DMEPOS) must revalidate every three years. As a catch all, CMS may demand that any provider revalidate and undergo screening at any time.

The new rule, found in Medicare Program Integrity Manual Chapter 15, sections 19 though 19.4, finalized provisions related to the (1) establishment of provider enrollment screening categories, (2) submission of application fees as part of the provider enrollment process, (3) suspensions of payment based on credible allegations of fraud, and (4) authority to impose a temporary moratorium on the enrollment of new Medicare providers and suppliers of a particular type (or the establishment of new practice locations of a particular type) in a geographic area.

The screening process establishes 3 levels of risk – limited, moderate, or high – and each provider will be assigned to a risk category. The rule also addresses application fees. Providers initially enrolling in Medicare will pay an initial application fee, and current provides will pay the fee when they revalidate.

Continue reading
Published on:

by

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) announced a new program on Wednesday to encourage the innovation of health information technology through prizes and challenges. The program, called Investing in Innovations (i2) Initiative, was created under the America Compete Reauthorization Act of 2010 and has already awarded the first $5 million to two projects.

For more information on health care law developments, please visit www.wachler.com.

Investing in Innovations (i2) Initiative http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt?open=512&mode=2&objID=3635&in_hi_userid=11673

Published on:

by

AARP recently unveiled an online tool aimed at helping senior citizen beneficiaries fully understand their quarterly health care statements. This tool will aid in fully informing seniors of all charges the Medicare program has paid, along with dates, billing codes and a description of the medical service. The AARP website urges senior citizens to use this tool to identify errors on their bill as well as to spot fraud.

CMS has made numerous efforts over the years to enlist the help of Medicare beneficiaries to detect and report Medicare Fraud.

An effective compliance program is the best defense against billing errors that can lead to complaints or allegations of Medicare fraud by beneficiaries. If you have any questions regarding Medicare billing or development of a compliance program, please contact a Wachler & Associates attorney at 248-544-0888.

Published on:

by

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) recently reported that it believes Medicaid is being inappropriately billed for certain nonmedical services (e.g. bathing, dressing and light housework). As a result of two recent audits, OIG has requested that North Carolina and Washington refund the federal government more $61 million resulting from improper Medicaid claims. It was discovered that these claims lacked the necessary documentation. Additionally, it was determined that the claims weren’t included in the states’ plan of care, were provided without medical supervision and the qualifications for the in-home providers could not be verified.

If you have any questions relating to home health compliance or Medicaid/Medicare billing requirements, please contact a Wachler & Associates attorney at 248-544-0888.

Contact Information
210 E 3rd St #204
Royal Oak, MI 48067
Phone: 248-544-0888
Fax: 248-544-3111

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2016 – 2025, Wachler & Associates, P.C.
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design