Published on:

President Obama signed the “Preservation of Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries and Pension Relief Act of 2010.” The law includes a provision that clarifies Medicare’s position for payment of hospital outpatient services provided on either the day of or the three days prior to an inpatient admission. The 3-day payment window policy is effective for services provided on or after June 25, 2010. Medicare may not reopen claims submitted prior to June 25, 2010 to require a separate bill for outpatient non-diagnostic services.

The 3-day payment window, which has been unofficially followed by Medicare since 1991, allows a hospital to charge for all diagnostic services and non-diagnostic services “related” to the inpatient stay that are provided during the 3-day payment window.

The law defines “other services related to the admission” as including services that are not diagnostic services (other than ambulance and maintenance renal dialysis services) for which payment may be made by Medicare that are provided to a patient by a hospital: (1) on the date of the patient’s inpatient admission; (2) during the 3 days immediately prior to the date of admission, unless the hospital shows that the services provided were not related to the admission.

Published on:

Three Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) posted new issues.

  • The RAC for Region A, DCS Healthcare, posted 23 new approved issues. One new issue applies to DME supplier claims and applies to providers in all Region A states.
  • Connolly Healthcare, the RAC for Region C, posted 3 new issues for non-medical necessity DRG validation reviews. These issues apply to providers in: AL, AK, CO, FL, GA, LA, MS, NM, NC, OK, PR, SC, TN, TX, VI, VA and WV.
  • Published on:

    In its report, “The Medicare RAC Program: Update to the evaluation of the three-year demonstration,” the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reveals that providers have been winning more appeals since its last report in January 2009. The report first noted that the number of reported claims for appeal have decreased significantly since the January 2009 report. The decrease is due to a more accurate method of counting claims, i.e., claims are now counted only once regardless of how many levels of appeal the provider pursues. In addition, CMS removed claims from the category of “appealed” if the denial was reversed by the contractor after it received additional documentation from the provider.

    CMS’s report also found that providers chose to appeal 12.7 percent (76,073) of the RAC determinations. Of those appealed claims, 64.4 percent were overturned on appeal.

    If you need assistance with a RAC or third party payor audit or for more information, please visit www.racattorneys.com or contact a Wachler & Associates attorney at 248-544-0888.

    Published on:

    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued Advisory Opinion 10-08 to address the provision of dietitian and social worker services at a freestanding radiation oncology center (Center) at no extra charge to the beneficiaries. The OIG determined that the proposed arrangement would not violate the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and thus, the OIG would not impose administrative sanctions.

    The proposed arrangement involved patients at the Center receiving dietitian and social worker services at no additional charge. The OIG addressed the arrangement as it affected Medicare beneficiaries. The services would not be advertised as “free” or “at no charge.” Patients would receive the dietitian services after being identified for risk of nutritional complications and social worker services would be provided during the patient’s treatment. Under the proposed arrangement, the services would not be separately billed, and the applicable cost sharing amounts for the Medicare beneficiaries would not be routinely waived.

    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) informed the OIG that the dietitian and social worker services provided at the Center would fall within the reimbursement the Center received for the patients. Thus, the amounts that the Medicare beneficiaries pay to share the costs would be partially attributable to the costs of the dietitian and social worker services and the Center would not be provided the services free because of this reimbursement. If this form of reimbursement had not been factored into the proposed arrangement, then the services would not be part of the reimbursement and could implicate the Anti-Kickbac Statute.

    Published on:

    On June 18 the U.S. Senate passed a six-month plan to prevent the Medicare physician 21 percent payment cut. The measure, which will cost $6.4 billion, was pushed through with the concern that the steep payment cut would raise the possibility that medical providers would turn away patients covered by Medicare. It will delay the cuts until November 30, 2010 while Congress tries to create a long-term plan. The plan was passed unanimously and lawmakers attribute its passage to the efforts to offset its attributed costs.

    Almost immediately after the U.S. Senate announced the passage of the plan, Medicare announced that it would process Medicare claims received for June at the lower rate. This is because the U.S. House of Representatives will not be able to consider the plan until next week. However, there are indications that the bill’s success in the House may be complicated. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that the House will not pass the Senate bill until the Senate agrees to act on job-creation legislation. If the bill does pass in the House, Medicare providers will have the burden to resubmit their claims to be made whole.

    For more information on Medicare payments or the physician fee cut, please visit www.wachler.com or contact a Wachler & Associates attorney at 248-544-0888.

    Published on:

    Michigan’s budget may be threatened by U.S. Congressional action. Crain’s Detroit Business reported that Congress’ concern over the nation’s deficit may affect its willingness to pay for an estimated $24 billion in Medicaid assistance to states and other financial assistance, leading to the removal of the enhanced Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) provision from legislation pased by the U.S. House in May.

    Due to these cuts, Michigan lawmakers are concerned that Michigan may not receive $514 million in Medicaid “matching” funds from the federal government. The amount was already factored into the fiscal year 2011 budget for the Michigan Department of Community Health. If Michigan does not receive this funding it may result in deep cuts in various programs, such as Medicaid prescription drug coverage, payments to Medicaid providers, mental health services, revenue sharing and university funding.

    For more information on Michigan health care, please visit www.wachler.com or contact a Wachler & Associates attorney at 248-544-0888.

    Published on:

    The Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation released details about a new high-risk pool that will offer insurance to the uninsured. To qualify the individuals must have been uninsured for at least six months, have been rejected by an insurer, and first spend $1,000 in out-of-pocket costs.

    The purpose of the pool is to provide an avenue for the uninsured chronically ill to buy coverage until state exchanges are created by the federal health reforms in 2014. Policies in the pool will include low co-pays for drugs and services. However, services not covered in the pool include: dental, vision, nursing home, chiropractic care, hearing aids, and bariatric and cosmetic surgery. Enrollment begins in September and coverage starts in October.

    The concern regarding the high-risk pool is the requirement that individuals pay $1,000 up front before receiving coverage. This provision may render the coverage unattainable for many chronically ill individuals.

    Published on:

    As noted in our June 11 blog entry, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) recently took unprecedented action in immediately suspending the board certifications of 139 physicians. We have been in communication with the ABIM urging them to characterize the action as non-final recommended action pending appeal rather than an immediate suspension. Our intent is to avoid the irreparable impact that an immediate suspension will have on our clients’ staff privileges and relationship with third party payors. We have submitted legal support for this position, and we hope to work with the ABIM to effectuate a more reasonable and thought out solution.

    As of today, the following notation has been added to each of the affected physician’s entries on the ABIM website: “Under Appeal – Suspension not final.” This is a significant advancement for all parties involved. We are hopeful that we will be able to effectuate a workable solution through further communication and the appeals process.

    For more updated information, please visit the Wall Street Journal’s health blog.

    Published on:

    The Director of Health Care for the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Kathleen M. King, recently testified before the Subcommittees on Health and Oversight, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. An important component of her testimony included a recommendation that Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) should focus their post-payment review activities on home health and durable medical equipment providers.

    Ms. King reported in her testimony that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) estimates improper payments for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) reached $24.1 billion for calendar year 2009. However, Ms. King emphasized that this may not be the full figure, and identified challenges to and strategies for preventing fraud, waste, and abuse and to reduce improper payments. The GAO identified five strategies to help CMS address these challenges. The strategies are: (1) strengthening provider enrollment processes and standards, (2) improving pre-payment review of claims, (3) focusing post-payment claims review on most vulnerable areas, (4) improving oversight of contractors, and (5) developing a robust process for addressing identified vulnerabilities.

    Ms. King also discussed the future strategy for RACs. She stated that since RACs are paid on a contingent fee basis, they often focus their post-payment reviews on health provider with expensive claims. However, the GAO recommends that RACs focus their post-payment review activities on items and services where RACs are not expected, specifically home health and durable medical equipment.

    Published on:

    Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are beginning to populate Michigan’s healthcare sector. ACOs are integrated groups of hospitals, physicians, long-term care facilities and home health agencies. A provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) authorized provider organizations to create ACOs so long as they agree to manage care for a minimum of 5,000 Medicare patients. The purpose of the ACOs is to provide providers with a financial incentive to coordinate care and improve the quality of care.

    Crain’s Detroit Business reported several ACOs forming in Michigan. The article notes that Oakwood Healthcare Inc., University of Michigan Health System, Detroit Medical Center, and Trinity Health are all in various stages of forming ACOs.

    Despite their popularity, some critics fear that ACOs will prevent doctors from participating in other healthcare contracts or take away doctors’ ability to effectively negotiate.

    Contact Information