Published on:

February 2010: In November 2009, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced changes to Medicare’s 2010 home health prospective payment system rates and modifications to the home health outlier policy. The rule became effective January 1, 2010.

In recent years, CMS has become more attuned to the growth in outlier payments, specifically very high outlier payments in certain areas of the country. An outlier payment is made for an episode that has a cost which exceeds a threshold amount. A Home Health Agency must bear a fixed dollar loss (FDL) before an episode becomes eligible for outlier payments. In 2009 CMS did not raise the FDL ratio due to the extremely high outlier payments in designated areas.

For CY 2010, CMS underwent an analysis of all providers who received outlier payments, focusing on total HH PPS payments, total outlier payments, number of episodes, number of outlier episodes, and location of provider. This analysis prompted CMS to propose an agency level outlier cap: in any given calendar year, an individual HHA will receive a maximum of 10 percent of its total HH PPS payments in outlier payments. In addition, CMS proposed to reduce the FDL ratio to .67 for CY 2010 (from .89 in CY 2009).

Published on:

On February 5, 2010 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rescinded Change Request(CR) 6375, Transmittal 1873, dated December 11, 2009. The rescinded CR contained instructions regarding place of service (POS) and date of service (DOS) for the professional component (i.e. interpretation) and technical component of diagnostic tests. The accompanying MLN Matters article, MM6375, is also rescinded. CMS intends to publish a replacement CR once there is policy clarification on these issues.

For more information, visit www.wachler.com or contact one of our attorneys at 248-544-0888.

Published on:

On January 28, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced modified additional documentation request limits for institutional providers for the RAC program in FY 2010. The limits will be annually set by each RAC in accordance with this CMS guidance to create a per campus cap on the maximum number of medical records that may be requested within a 45-day period.

In accordance with this announcement, the RAC for Region D, HealthDataInsights (HDI), has announced that it will soon begin sending Additional Document Request (ADR) letters to hospitals in the Region. The ADR letters will be mailed to the contact names listed on HDI’s provider portal. If no contact information has been provided, the letter will be sent to the hospital’s compliance officer or the chief financial officer.

For additional information regarding the RAC program and relevant updates, please visit our RAC website at https://www.wachler.com/ or contact a Wachler & Associates attorney at (248) 544-0888.

Published on:

On January 27, 2010, leaders of the American Dental Association (ADA), American Medical Association (AMA), American Osteopathic Association (AOA), and the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Jon Leibovitz requesting that health professionals be excluded from the “Red Flags” Rule, a new regulation intended to combat identity theft.

The letter was prompted by a recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia involving a suit was brought by the American Bar Association (ABA) against the FTC. The court ruled that lawyers should be excluded from the requirements of the Red Flags Rule. The court stated that the application of the Red Flags Rule to attorneys “is both erroneous and inconsistent with the purpose underlying enactment of the [Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act)].”

Similarly, the leaders of these health professional organizations called upon the FTC to exclude health professionals from the Red Flags Rule. The joint letter to the Chairman requests that the FTC take two actions: (1) announce that the Rule will not be applied against licensed healthcare professionals (LHCPs) until at least ninety days after final resolution of the ABA litigation; and (2) confirm that if the final resolution of the ABA litigation is that the Rule will not be applied to attorneys, the Rule will also not be applied to LHCPs.

Published on:

The RAC for Region D, HealthDataInsights (HDI), recently approved “anesthesia care package” and evaluation and management services for RAC review. Specifically, HDI stated:

Under NCCI Edit rules, the anesthesia care package consists of preoperative evaluation, standard preparation and monitoring services, administration of anesthesia, and post-anesthesia recovery care. Anesthesia CPT codes 00100 to 01999 (except 01996) include Evaluation & Management (E&M) services rendered on the day before anesthesia (pre-operative day), the day of anesthesia and all post-operative days. CPT code 01996 includes E&M services rendered on the same day as the 01996 service only. Physicians can indicate that E&M services rendered during the anesthesia period are unrelated to the anesthesia procedure by submitting modifiers 24, 25, 57 and/or 59, depending on claim specific circumstances, on E&M service. Only critical care E&M services are payable during the anesthesia post-operative period. The post-operative period is defined as the day immediately following the anesthesia service and any subsequent days during the same inpatient hospital admission as for the anesthesia service.

To date, HDI is the only RAC to approve the review of anesthesia care package and E&M services, although other RACs are likely to follow. RAC Region D includes Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Iowa, Idaho, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, Guam, American Samoa, and Northern Marianas.

Published on:

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissed a lawsuit filed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) against the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The suit was based on the DHHS’s cuts to Medicare reimbursements for cardiology services. The ACC requested the court to block the cuts and to prevent Medicare from using the Physician Practice Information Survey (PPIS) methodology for calculating payment rates. According to the ACC, PPIS methodology does not provide an accurate picture of physician costs. In its ruling, the court stated that it dismissed the lawsuit because it did not have the authority to review Medicare claims.

This ruling will affect Medicare physicians of all specialties who may face a 21.2% fee cut as a result of the 2010 Physician Fee Schedule. Although the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that would prevent this 21.2% physician payment cut in November, the Senate has yet to vote on a permanent solution. For now, the House voted to temporarily suspend the cut for two months.

For more information, visit www.wachler.com or contact one of our attorneys at 248-544-0888.

Published on:

On January 13, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a special fraud alert to remind durable medical equipment (DME) suppliers that unsolicited telephone calls to Medicare beneficiaries are prohibited by federal law. The fraud alert referred specifically to instances in which independent marketing firms make unsolicited contact with Medicare beneficiaries to market the DME supplier.

The Social Security Act prohibits such unsolicited contact by a DME supplier, except in three specific situations:

(1) when the beneficiary has given express written permission to the supplier to contact him or her by phone;

Contact Information